抱歉,警校招生规定男女比例这件事,我们还是需要质疑
来源:微信公号“ CGTN”
警校高考设立性别比例的事情,
大伙都听说了吗?
相信很多人第一反应都是,
“嗨,这有啥啊?”
男生体能比女生强,
不是不争的事实吗?
但是,仍有不少人质疑,
性别比例属于性别歧视。
为这事,
网络上已经吵翻了天,
就连@绵阳网警巡查执法都出动了,
直呼要打击“碰瓷特殊专业录取比例”的“极端女权”。
With the recent conclusion of China's national college entrance exams, or Gaokao, netizens have been discussing gender limits in the admissions process to police university, with many alleging that the policy constitutes sexual discrimination.
Two weeks before, as Gaokao approached, many police stations throughout the country released university admission schemes on China's Twitter-like Weibo to welcome prospective fresh blood.
However, things went awry in no time when a huge gap was found in the recruitment of males and females. For example, the China Fire and Rescue Institute planned to recruit 302 male students and 18 female students in 2019, with females taking up only about five percent.
Other police universities also set a gender limit, usually recruiting “no more than 15%” female students in total.
Many netizens argue that the gender limits are unreasonable and should be regarded as discriminatory against women. Others believe that people were being too sensitive over this issue.
本是好意,引来争议
近日,恰逢一年一度的高考。为了鼓励学子,为高考加油,不少警察单位都争相在微博上贴出了招生计划,不料却引来了轩然大波。
在大多数警校招生计划中,不少网友惊讶地发现,均明确规定“女生录取比例不超过15%”。
少数警校的录取比例还更夸张。例如,在中国消防救援学院的招生计划中,准备招收的男生为302人,女生仅为18人,男女比例达到了惊人的17:1,女生人数约等于5%。
女生人数这么少?凭什么?不少网友提出了“性别歧视”的质疑。
China's Ministry of Education released regulations in 2013 stipulating that universities should not grant privileges on the basis of gender, but schools that had majors linked to three special professions are exempt. The first is professions that have a gender limit in the job market, such as those in military, national defense, and public security; the second is professions that prohibit the hiring of women based on the Law on the Protection of Women's Rights and Interests, such as mining and sailing; and the third is professions that require gender balance based on social conventions, such as broadcasting and hosting.
其实,这个问题,一早就有人试图给过解释。公安专业女生计划数不超过招生计划总数的15%,是考虑到“公安工作高风险、强应急、超负荷的特殊性”。
教育部早在2012年就做过回应,称男女依法享有平等的受教育机会,但基于国家利益,特殊专业可调男女招生比例。
2013年,教育部再次强调,高校招生“不得擅自规定男女生比例”,“少数院校的特殊专业除外。”
三类特殊专业分别是:
1. 与特定职业要求紧密相关,且职业对男女比例有要求的专业,如军事、国防、公共安全类专业;
2. 从保护女性的角度,适当限制女性报考,如航海、采矿等专业;
3. 个别招生数量有限且社会需求有一定的性别均衡要求的专业,包括部分非通用语种专业、播音主持专业等。
但是,事情可能没这么简单。
比如,具体来讲:
哪些高校的哪些专业属于“特殊专业”?
飞行、地质勘探之类的模糊专业究竟怎么分类?
“特殊行业”和“特殊岗位”之“特殊”是基于哪些标准?
性别比例究竟对“国家利益”造成了怎样的影响?
15%的比例规定从何而来?为什么不是20%?30%?为什么只设上限不设下限?
这些,都是网络争议的焦点。
- 下一页
当然超15%啊,你这是把非公安类的比例也算进来了啊。
各地的警官学院都有分公安类和非公安类,非公安类有法学,计算机等专业。女生在非公安类高点也正常,可非公安类不穿警服,也不用按照警务化管理,主要出路也不是考公安考试,不能算进公安类比例里面去哦。
反对歧视没问题,不要碰瓷。
我单位以同样专业招聘来的一个女生,第二年就不出外业了,第三年单位选派她出去学另一个专业,回来之后安排个其他岗位,还是个副科待遇。说难听点,依社会实际情况来看,部分特殊行业一旦使用大量女性,将剥夺其他男同事公平竞争的机会。
太过分了。
那一百多个坑就应该由作者这样的杠精填上。