河北“狮身人面像”疑重建 埃及再次愤怒

  • 说我没看过,呵呵哒。知道这个纳芙蒂蒂像是放在哪国博物馆的不?还是镇馆之宝?知道这个东西在德国的保险价格是多少不?3.9亿美金
    看看这些文章咋说?
    发现人有造假传统和历史
    塑像上面有多层抹灰结构,不符合当时的建造传统
    艺术性上和古埃及style不一致
    支撑的底座altar造假

    https://abcnews.go.com/International/examining-nefertitis-likeness-life/story?id=17905667
    Egyptologist Christian Bayer recently discovered a fragment that perfectly matches the original in a Cairo museum. It's a copy. Bayer suspects that the bust was used for purposes of mass production, an official propaganda image of sorts -- not unlike the images of Josef Stalin.
    in reality Borchardt's job -- in the struggle against the other imperialistic powers, England, France and the United States -- was to fill Germany's museums with treasures from the days of the pharaohs.
    回应你上面的这个放射性测试问题
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/nefertiti-bust-may-be-a-fake-art-historians-1.776435
    Stierlin has argued that while is it possible to carbon-date pigments, it is impossible to accurately date the bust because it is made of stone covered in plaster.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-bust-of-Nefertiti-a-forgery
    Inconsistent with Egyptian style
    Borchardt (the guy who first has the bust), was, unethical at best, but had a reputation as a forger and a reputation for buying fakes and making fakes and trying to pass them off as real.
    Additionally we know for a fact other parts in support of the bust are certainly fake, we know because...

    "The renowned Egyptologist Rolf Krauss, a curator at the Egyptian Museum in Berlin for more than 20 years and the custodian of the Nefertiti bust, claims that the folding altar used as compensation for the bust was fake.

    Krauss theorizes that Borchardt, consumed with ambition, had the magnificent panel, with which he enticed Lefebvre, made by skilled stonemasons in Cairo.
    The bust is made of stone, but has plaster on it. This is again, unheard of. It is also possible that the bust was modified. It could have been a bust of someone else, was changed in appearance. For instance,

回复1

  • 第一,一件文物造假否定不了整个文明,何况你给出的证据,比如那个quora,最后也没有完全肯定是造假,作者也了说,万一是我们之前没见过的类型呢。
    第二,我是针对你第一次给的那个链接,你肯定没有好好读过那个链接的内容,否则你也不会拿那个链接当证据了,你更应该拿你新给出的例子。
返回文章

站务

全部专栏